home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!monu6!aurora.cc.monash.edu.au!andrewc
- From: andrewc@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au (Andrew J. Cosgriff !)
- Subject: Re: [FIX] PS FIX FOR 99p2 !!!
- Message-ID: <andrewc.726742272@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au>
- Keywords: ps fix 99 p2
- Sender: news@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Usenet system)
- Organization: Monash University, Melb., Australia.
- References: <andrewc.726028260@aurora.cc.monash.edu.au> <PuyTwB3w165w@kf8nh.wariat.org> <1iql03INNdm2@escargot.xx.rmit.OZ.AU>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 08:51:12 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- rcopg@minyos.xx.rmit.OZ.AU (Paul Gortmaker) writes:
-
- > Okay, it seems that the /proc based ps is the way to go. But what about
- >stuff like "top". Is it in the works for a /proc based version ??? Or will it
- >be okay with the previously posted patch? (Which BTW, I haven't tried yet...
- >I'll brave it this afternoon.)
-
- No, that's why (among other reasons) it's in the BETA / ALPHA directory (depends
- where you go) at the FTP sites...Sure, if I knew enough about ps/top/proc-fs
- I'd do it myself, but, well, i don't...Perhaps it's time to learn...
-
- > Just out of curiousity, are there any drawbacks to using the /proc
- >based stuff???
-
- You'll probably get very confused trying to look at the /proc/self dir. :)
- As you said, top, w, etc. aren't done yet, but hang in there I'd expect...
-
- Enjoy !
-
- Cos !
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- * Andrew J. Cosgriff ! * #include <std_witty_quote.h>
- #define HERE cc.monash.edu.au #include <std_disclaimer.h>
- Hassle me at : andrewc@aurora.HERE ; andrewc@lindblat.HERE ; cos@yoyo.HERE
-