home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!nmrdc1!dsc3pzp
- From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Can't get the GCC 2.3.3 to work right. :(
- Message-ID: <C0EtBq.1t0@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil>
- Date: 6 Jan 93 01:55:01 GMT
- References: <9301051814.AA29042@deepthought.cs.utexas.edu> <JEM.93Jan5225917@lk-hp-6.hut.fi>
- Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <JEM.93Jan5225917@lk-hp-6.hut.fi> jem@snakemail.hut.fi (Johan Myreen) writes:
- >I would like to see the binutils package distributed with gcc, to
- >avoid problems like this, and also because the assembler and the
- >linker are closely related to the compiler (the compiler driver needs
- >them.) Commercial compiler packages come with "batteries included."
-
- The docs announcing gcc 2.3.3 (about 2 pages) suggested getting the
- binutils.TZ from tsx-11.mit.edu if you have not upgraded for a while.
-
- --
- ===========================================================================
- phil perucci | "Any opinions expressed are solely my own views and
- ssb1pzp@digex.com | do not reflect the position of any organization"
- ===========================================================================
-