home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!news
- From: ss@uucp
- Subject: Re: Old Libc, can it be tossed?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.200835.16902@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: e40-008-4.mit.edu
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- References: <Jan.4.00.08.56.1993.29115@geneva.rutgers.edu> <1993Jan5.140207.29191@klaava.Helsinki.FI> <C0E7zB.8xL@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 20:08:35 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <C0E7zB.8xL@ra.nrl.navy.mil> eric@tantalus.nrl.navy.mil (Eric Youngdale) writes:
-
- [very informative background about jump/shared libs]
-
- My only complaint about linux jump/classic shared libraries is the
- difficulty with which the're created, especially the X libs. Right now
- it seems only a handful of people can actually put together
- jump/classic shared libs. I can think of many widget sets that I'd
- love to use but have to forego since I only how to make them static
- (Wcl, Xc, and Xaw3d come to mind). Are we to expect a collection of
- scripts that would automate or semi-automate the process of making
- shared libraries and render making them feasible to the average user?
- I hope so. Right now I know only of ones in the GCC directory on
- tsx-11 which are overly difficult and seem very specific to only the
- libs they were written for.
-
-
- /Muhammad M. Saggaf | Stop the genocide
- alsaggaf@athena.mit.edu | Save Bosnia
-
-
-