home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!news.stolaf.edu!lars.acc-admin.stolaf.edu!johnsonm
- From: johnsonm@lars.acc-admin.stolaf.edu (Michael K. Johnson)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent
- Subject: Re: Linux v. Coherent: Comments
- Message-ID: <1993Jan8.044917.11474@news.stolaf.edu>
- Date: 8 Jan 93 04:49:17 GMT
- References: <1ic3o7INNmep@uwm.edu> <1993Jan6.141803.2046@athena.mit.edu>
- <1993Jan6.171152.9891@sfu.ca> <1ihc1iINNh6q@uwm.edu>
- <1993Jan7.165301.2889@news.stolaf.edu> <KENJI.93Jan8110143@daemun.rcac.astem.or.jp>
- Sender: news@news.stolaf.edu
- Followup-To: comp.os.coherent
- Organization: St. Olaf College; Northfield, MN USA
- Lines: 17
- In-Reply-To: kenji@rcac.astem.or.jp's message of 8 Jan 93 02:01:43 GMT
-
-
- In article <KENJI.93Jan8110143@daemun.rcac.astem.or.jp> kenji@rcac.astem.or.jp (Kenji Rikitake) writes:
-
- ] Please don't poison the air like this.
-
- Porting something is worth being considered a creative activity. And
- people who look down on porting often haven't done it by themselves.
-
- I was refering to his seeming implication that MWC was acting
- illegally, not to porting. I have NO problems with MWC using code
- legally, and was merely stating that I didn't think that they would
- use it illegally by violating the copyright.
-
- Can we cut this thread, please? There's been far too much on it
- already...
-
- michaelkjohnson
-