home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!funic!nntp.hut.fi!usenet
- From: jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala)
- Subject: Re: WELL anonymity policy
- In-Reply-To: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.224918.1032@nntp.hut.fi>
- Sender: usenet@nntp.hut.fi (Usenet pseudouser id)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lusmu.cs.hut.fi
- Reply-To: jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala)
- Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
- References: <1993Jan4.194622.2669@nntp.hut.fi> <1993Jan4.224620.6980@eff.org> <1993Jan5.120157.6068@nntp.hut.fi> <1993Jan5.190324.15756@eff.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 22:49:18 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1993Jan5.190324.15756@eff.org>, mnemonic@eff (Mike Godwin) writes:
- >In article <1993Jan5.120157.6068@nntp.hut.fi> jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala) writes:
- >
- >>In any case, I think email is more appropriate than the public forum
- >>for pointing out the details (involving personal issues) what someone
- >>thinks is the problem.
- >
- >Yet without some reference to the details of the conduct you're
- >criticizing, how can readers of this conference know which conduct is
- >objectionable? What one person thinks is harassment may be seen by another
- >as reasonable discourse. For an example of this, see below.
-
- After discussing this with Mike and some other people via email and
- refreshing my memories of past discussions on comp.org.eff.talk I have
- concluded that it isn't useful for me (or the readers of the
- newsgroup) that I continue on this thread with Mike, and thus I will
- not do so.
-
- //Jyrki
-