home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!mnemonic
- From: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
- Subject: Re: WELL anonymity policy
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.190324.15756@eff.org>
- Originator: mnemonic@eff.org
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
- Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
- References: <1993Jan4.194622.2669@nntp.hut.fi> <1993Jan4.224620.6980@eff.org> <1993Jan5.120157.6068@nntp.hut.fi>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 19:03:24 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1993Jan5.120157.6068@nntp.hut.fi> jkp@cs.HUT.FI (Jyrki Kuoppala) writes:
-
- >In any case, I think email is more appropriate than the public forum
- >for pointing out the details (involving personal issues) what someone
- >thinks is the problem.
-
- Yet without some reference to the details of the conduct you're
- criticizing, how can readers of this conference know which conduct is
- objectionable? What one person thinks is harassment may be seen by another
- as reasonable discourse. For an example of this, see below.
-
- >>Are there other fields in which problem-solving is done without any
- >>mention of the particulars of the problem?
- >
- >Wise-ass cracks like the above two lines are a good example of what I
- >was talking about.
-
- I'm not sure how the two lines you refer to here constitute a
- "wise-ass crack." Perhaps you could explain your reasoning?
-
-
- --Mike
-
-
-
-
- --
- Mike Godwin, |"I'm waiting for the one-man revolution
- mnemonic@eff.org| The only one that's coming."
- (617) 864-0665 |
- EFF, Cambridge | --Robert Frost
-