home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!irving.nas.nasa.gov!pomeranz
- From: pomeranz@irving.nas.nasa.gov (Hal R. Pomeranz)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.perl
- Subject: unshift() behavior
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.012728.12746@nas.nasa.gov>
- Date: 7 Jan 93 01:27:28 GMT
- Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator)
- Organization: NAS, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California
- Lines: 19
-
-
- Is it just me or does anybody else think that
-
- unshift(@list, 1..10);
-
- should do the same thing as
-
- @list = reverse 1..10;
-
- I guess I'm thinking that unshift should jam its arguments onto the
- front of the list one at a time rather than en masse as it does
- currently. Of course, it's probably faster to do it as a lump, but
- it somehow seems non-intuitive to me...
-
- --
- ===============================================================================
- Hal Pomeranz Senior Member of Technical Staff NASA Ames Research Center
- pomeranz@nas.nasa.gov pomeranz@cs.swarthmore.edu
- "I sit and stare with hardened eyes through a time when life's so hard." --L&O
-