home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!newserver.jvnc.net!gmd.de!qw3!thomas
- From: thomas@gmd.de (Tom Gordon, I3.KI 2665)
- Subject: Re: Lisp Parsers
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.081133.2633@gmd.de>
- Sender: news@gmd.de (USENET News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: qw3
- Reply-To: thomas@gmd.de
- Organization: GMD, Sankt Augustin, Germany.
- References: <11586@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 08:11:33 GMT
- Lines: 34
-
- In article 11586@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au, berglas@cs.uq.oz.au (Anthony Berglas) writes:
-
- > God said that f(a, b); is easier
- > to read than (f a b), it requires less characters.
- >
-
- I didn't see a smiley, :-), but let's suppose this was intended to be ironic.
-
-
- > Seriously, (> (+ x 1) (* y 2)) is ugly, and it would be pretty easy
- > to add a parser to Lisp that could be used instead of the normal Reader.
-
- Well, you know what they say about beauty being in the eye of the beholder.
- I, for one, much prefer Lisp/Scheme syntax. You can't beat it for elegance, which
- is why I find it beautiful. Also, with a good editor (i.e. emacs), selecting
- cutting, pasting and formatting s-expressions is so much easier than doing
- the same operations on arbitrary blocks and expressions in C.
-
- But these are religious matters, apparently, so I suppose the idea of supporting
- alternative surface syntaxes is a good one. Why not make everyone happy?
-
- >
- > If anyone has heard of such a thing I would be interested to know.
- >
-
- Sorry I can't help you here, but I do know that Apple plans to support an alternative
- "algol-like" surface syntax for its new Lisp dialect, Dylan.
-
- ---
- Thomas F. Gordon
- GMD, FIT; Artificial Intelligence Research Division
- 5205 Sankt Augustin 1 / Germany
- email: thomas.gordon@gmd.de; phone: (+49 2241) 14-2665
-
-