home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!barmar
- From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
- Subject: Re: draft standard question
- Date: 4 Jan 1993 19:57:57 GMT
- Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge MA, USA
- Lines: 22
- Message-ID: <1ia4s5INNpme@early-bird.think.com>
- References: <21495.1993Jan4.123513@bcars148>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: telecaster.think.com
-
- In article <21495.1993Jan4.123513@bcars148> emcoop@bnr.ca (hume smith) writes:
- >now that the public review period is over, and considering that they wouldn't
- >take email notices anyway, what would now the best way to mention that there
- >are conflicts in the descriptions of atan and atanh?
-
- There's almost certainly going to be a second public review period, to
- review the version of the draft that results from fixing the problems
- during the first review. You can raise this issue then. Unfortunately, if
- fixing it requires making a technical change to the draft, that would force
- a third revision and public review.
-
- X3J13 isn't technically restricted to making changes only as a result of
- review comments, although I believe we're trying to limit ourselves to
- this. Please send me a description of the problem and I'll see what needs
- to be done about it.
-
- What does not taking email comments have to do with it?
- --
- Barry Margolin
- System Manager, Thinking Machines Corp.
-
- barmar@think.com {uunet,harvard}!think!barmar
-