home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!infmx!cshaver
- From: cshaver@informix.com (Craig Shaver)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: feedback wanted on appropriate OOPL
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.170504.6400@informix.com>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 17:05:04 GMT
- References: <rmartin.726674455@thor> <TMB.93Jan10170408@arolla.idiap.ch> <rmartin.726795186@thor>
- Sender: news@informix.com (Usenet News)
- Organization: Informix Software, Inc.
- Lines: 30
-
- In article <rmartin.726795186@thor> rmartin@thor.Rational.COM (Bob Martin) writes:
- ......
- ........
- >
- >Deferring error detection to runtime is risky, since the error may be
- >encountered several months after its release. Also, there are several
- >C++ development environments that catch runtime errors just as nicely
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
- Could you provide a few names? Are they interpretor based?
- Expensive? Available on multiple platforms?
-
- >as stalk does. So, I don't accept that runtime error detection is
- >either an advantage or the exclusive domain of stalk.
-
- A good development environment can make up for a lot of deficiencies
- in a language :'}.
-
- >
- >
- >--
- >Robert Martin Training courses offered in:
- >R. C. M. Consulting Object Oriented Analysis
- >2080 Cranbrook Rd. Object Oriented Design
- >Green Oaks, Il 60048 (708) 918-1004 C++
-
-
- --
- Craig Shaver (cshaver@informix.com for now) (415)390-0654 (415)926-6407
- Productivity Group POB 60458 Sunnyvale, CA 94088
-