home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Path: sparky!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!cc-server4.massey.ac.nz!nuntius
- From: news@massey.ac.nz (USENET News System)
- Subject: Re: struct vs. typedef
- Message-ID: <1993Jan13.020738.9171@massey.ac.nz>
- Organization: Massey University
- X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1
- References: <uRL4wB7w165w@cybrspc.uucp>
- <1993Jan11.170937.22822@informix.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 93 02:07:38 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <uRL4wB7w165w@cybrspc.uucp> Roy M. Silvernail,
- roy%cybrspc@cs.umn.edu writes:
- >Nevertheless, I ended up with
- >
- >typedef struct n {
- > int x,y;
- > struct n *last,*next, *up, *down;
- > void (*show)(struct n *);
- > int width;
- > void **value;
- >} ITEM;
- >
- I prefer,
-
- #define ITEM struct n
-
- typedef ITEM {
- int x,y;
- ITEM *last,*next,*up,*down;
- void (*show)(ITEM *);
- int width;
- void **value;
- };
-
- Just my $0.02 worth.
-
- Rob.
-