home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!geac!lethe!druid!darcy
- From: darcy@druid.uucp (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
- Subject: Re: readable code
- Message-ID: <1993Jan8.123037.12575@druid.uucp>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1993 12:30:37 GMT
- References: <C04xuo.476@world.std.com> <6831@npri6.npri.com> <1993Jan6.170041.29055@daimi.aau.dk>
- Organization: D'Arcy Cain Consulting
- Lines: 14
-
- rorschak@daimi.aau.dk (Jesper Lauridsen) writes:
- >murphy@npri6.npri.com (David P. Murphy) writes:
- >> "++x" is more readable. [down! down! bad lurker! (whack) (whack)]
- >I prefer "x++" myself.
-
- Why isn't there a +x+ construct for those who can't decide?
-
- P.S: BIG :-)
-
- --
- D'Arcy J.M. Cain (darcy@druid.com) |
- D'Arcy Cain Consulting | There's no government
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada | like no government!
- +1 416 424 2871 DoD#0082 |
-