home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- From: fred@genesis.demon.co.uk (Lawrence Kirby)
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!genesis.demon.co.uk!fred
- Subject: Re: applying or
- Distribution: world
- References: <726190196snz@panache.demon.co.uk>
- Organization: BT
- X-Mailer: Simple NEWS 1.90 (ka9q DIS 1.19)
- Lines: 14
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 10:58:28 +0000
- Message-ID: <726231508snz@genesis.demon.co.uk>
- Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
-
- In article <726190196snz@panache.demon.co.uk> raph@panache.demon.co.uk writes:
-
- <stuff deleted>
- >The language semantics are defined such that the OR and AND oeprators are
- >sequential. Therefore, if you can *detect* that the order has been changed, the
- >compiler may not change the order. If there is no way that you can detect the
- >order of evaluation, then what the hell...
-
- I can detect it because it runs faster! :-)
-
- -----------------------------------------
- Lawrence Kirby | fred@genesis.demon.co.uk
- Wilts, England | 70734.126@compuserve.com
- -----------------------------------------
-