home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.graphics:13687 alt.graphics.pixutils:2899
- Newsgroups: comp.graphics,alt.graphics.pixutils
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!Sirius.dfn.de!hpux.rz.uni-jena.de!pfk
- From: pfk@rz.uni-jena.de (Frank Klemm)
- Subject: Re: Your one stop GRAPHICS shop!
- Message-ID: <1993Jan12.171012.10488@rz.uni-jena.de>
- Sender: news@rz.uni-jena.de (The News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cnve.rz.uni-jena.de
- Reply-To: pfk@rz.uni-jena.de (Frank Klemm)
- Organization: University Jena, Germany
- References: <1993Jan6.091522.27864@plx.com> <1993Jan6.145125.24519@a.cs.okstate.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 17:10:12 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
-
- In article <1993Jan6.145125.24519@a.cs.okstate.edu>, jmccorm@a.cs.okstate.edu (MCCORMICK JOSHUA C) writes:
- |> From article <1993Jan6.091522.27864@plx.com>, by thomas@plxsun (Thomas Leibold):
- |> > Now the worst thing that you can do to a continous tone (real life) picture
- |> > after removing most of the color information (by putting it into the 8-bit
- |> > GIF format) is to reduce the image content with GIFLITE.
- |> > I have yet to see a side by side comparison where it isn't obvious which
- |> > picture is GIFLITE damaged.
- |>
- |> Actually, the experience is just the reverse here for me. After searching a
- |> GIFLITE picture carefully, it is very difficult to tell _any_ damage to the
- |> picture. When comparing commonly available JPG's to the originals, the
- |> damage is more than obvious.
- |>
- Yes, you are right. alchemy -j1 pic.tga pic.jpg generates ugly pictures. But try
- alchemy -j50 !!!
-
- Frank
-