home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!cam-eng!cmh
- From: cmh@eng.cam.ac.uk (C.M. Hicks)
- Newsgroups: comp.dsp
- Subject: Re: Pitch shifting
- Message-ID: <1993Jan6.174558.27810@eng.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: 6 Jan 93 17:45:58 GMT
- References: <mikael.31ea@terapin.com> <1993Jan5.184530.4560@eng.cam.ac.uk> <herman.726269308@phage>
- Sender: cmh@eng.cam.ac.uk (C.M. Hicks)
- Organization: cam.eng
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: tw500.eng.cam.ac.uk
-
- herman@nosc.mil (John W. Herman) writes:
-
- >cmh@eng.cam.ac.uk (C.M. Hicks) writes:
-
- >>mikael@terapin.com (Mikael Andersson) writes:
-
- >> - FFT, scale frequency, IFFT.
- >> Main problems: discontinuities at block boundaries, computational load.
-
- >Windowing the input function with a Hann window, shifting only half the
- >FFT length, and adding the appropriate outputs of the IFFT will produce
- >fairly smooth output time series. But likely not in real time.
-
- Yeah, this is basically what I had in mind, with a block length of around
- 10 to 50 milliseconds (maybe 1024 CD samples, roughly 20ms). My fear is that
- it may introduce a modulation at either one or two times the block frequency.
- Real-time should be possible with a DSP with some clout.
-
- Christopher Hicks
-
- --
- ==============================================================================
- Christopher Hicks | If it doesn't fit...
- cmh@uk.ac.cam.eng | ...you need a bigger hammer.
- ==============================================================================
-