home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!think.com!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!att-out!pacbell.com!lll-winken!telecom-request
- From: mickeyf@clipper.zfe.siemens.de (Mickey Ferguson)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
- Subject: Re: Calling 1-800 Can Cost You a Fortune
- Message-ID: <telecom13.20.2@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 00:41:12 GMT
- Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Reply-To: mickeyf%clipper@pnsts412-sun.zfe.siemens.de
- Organization: TELECOM Digest
- Lines: 37
- Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 13, Issue 20, Message 2 of 17
-
- > If you always thought that 1-800 numbers (in the US) are toll free,
- > think again. With new technology and the lack of regulations, people
- > are finding new ways to make money.
-
- [stuff deleted]
-
- > It is possible, and apparently perfectly legal, to set an 800 number
- > such that when you call you hear a recording that tells you that there
- > will be charges for the call.
-
- [more stuff deleted]
-
- > So here are some scam ideas (these are all fiction; do not try it at
- > home):
-
- [more stuff deleted]
-
- How long will it be before the COCOTs jump into the calling card
- fraud? How difficult would it be to program a pay phone to look for
- when a caller dials the 800 number which is associated with one of the
- long distance providers, and then just capture the calling card
- digits, but pass on the digits and complete the call? Then the COCOT
- software just writes the calling card digits and the long distance
- provider into its private database, which is then dumped and sold off
- to the drug dealers, etc. The more I think about this, the more I get
- terrified at just how easy such a scam would be. Hmmmm, maybe I'll
- just go out and buy a pay phone and modify the software ... NOT!
-
- Maybe one idea to regulate COCOTs without too much difficulty or
- paperwork would be to require them to be bonded, just like a home
- contractor is. Since the possibilities are just sitting there, this
- would at least help to pay for any fraud that could result. Or am I
- being too paranoid?
-
-
- Mickey Ferguson -- PhoneMail Development -- ROLMfax and Eclipse
-