home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!mimsy!afterlife!cawilco
- From: cawilco@afterlife.ncsc.mil (Chris A. Wilcox)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.cell-relay
- Subject: Re: two more questions re: SONET and ATM
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.190553.29754@afterlife.ncsc.mil>
- Date: 4 Jan 93 19:05:53 GMT
- References: <1993Jan4.173229.25170@sics.se>
- Organization: The Great Beyond
- Lines: 42
-
- In article <1993Jan4.173229.25170@sics.se> craig@sics.se (Craig Partridge) writes:
-
- ...first question deleted...
-
- >Second, I'm getting conflicting information about how ATM cells get packed.
- >My understanding is that originally cells were packed into VC-4 payloads,
- >with bytes and octet boundaries in sync, but possibly offset within the
- >VC-4 payload (i.e. the H4 pointer may be non-zero). Furthermore, in the
- >worst case, a cell could span two VC-4 payloads (end of one and start of
- >the next). But more recently I'd been told that the rules have been
- >changed so that the ATM cells always start in the first byte of the VC-4
- >payload and there's no splitting cells across VC-4 payloads. Has this
- >change indeed taken place? [As a related side question, so far as I can
- >tell, SONET uses VC-4 packing for cells, just like SDH -- is that correct?]
-
- Hmmm, where to start. ANSI T1X1.5 is in the process of "splitting"
- T1.105 (the SONET spec) into component standards, e.g. T1.105.1,
- T1.105.2, etc. One of these new standards is going to be SONET payload
- mappings, which includes the ATM mapping. A contribution to be used as
- the starting point for this standard was submitted at the last T1X1.5
- meeting in November. In that contribution was the 'formula' for
- mapping ATM cells into SONET payloads. According to this contribution,
- ATM cells can be split across payloads. Also at this meeting (or at
- the previous one, perhaps) it was decided that the H4 byte would no
- longer be used to point to the first byte of the first ATM cell in the
- payload; it was deemed unnecessary. The start of the ATM cell could be
- found by examining the data in the payload. (I think they decided that
- it could be found via the HEC code, but not being an ATM expert, I
- could be very wrong on that point.)
-
- As for whether SONET uses VC-4 packing for cells like SDH -- for
- payloads above STS-3c, SONET and SDH payloads are virtually identical
- (I hesitate to say completely identical, since I've never seen an
- SDH payload). For STS-1, I would have to go back and see what the
- SDH specs say.
-
- Hope this helps...
- --
- Chris Wilcox | "Can we have a table closer to the plot?"
- Dept. of Defense | Crowe T. Robot
- cawilco@afterlife.ncsc.mil | MST3K
- The views represented here probably aren't held by the DoD. Get over it.
-