home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.databases.ingres
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!fractal!mdchaney
- From: mdchaney@fractal.ucs.indiana.edu (M Darrin Chaney)
- Subject: Re: DB admin tools
- Message-ID: <C0Ft19.4BD@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: fractal.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
- References: <ROBM.92Dec22120335@ishtar.Berkeley.EDU> <1993Jan5.004315.1@gsbacd.uchicago.edu> <1993Jan5.190338.23433@pony.Ingres.COM>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 14:46:20 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1993Jan5.190338.23433@pony.Ingres.COM> billc@ingres.com writes:
- >
- >Yes, the full-dependencies problem is hard, and we know that it's a
- >very popular request.
-
- It must be hard, since unloaddb still can't even handle views correctly.
-
- >Unfortunately, I believe that schemadef_II
- >only does the easy part, and doesn't handle "deeper" dependencies
- >like database procedures, events, rules, and so on.
-
- It'd actually work better (for schemadef) if those things just weren't
- dropped with the table.
-
- Darrin
- --
-
- mdchaney@iubacs mdchaney@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu mdchaney@rose.ucs.indiana.edu
-
- "I want- I need- to live, to see it all..."
-