home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!ub!niktow!pavlov
- From: pavlov@niktow.canisius.edu (Greg Pavlov)
- Newsgroups: comp.benchmarks
- Subject: Re: FTPable Performance Results
- Message-ID: <1954@niktow.canisius.edu>
- Date: 12 Jan 93 05:05:54 GMT
- References: <C0Lxqx.6p7.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Organization: Canisius College, Buffalo NY. 14208
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <C0Lxqx.6p7.1@cs.cmu.edu>, vac+@cs.cmu.edu (Vincent Cate) writes:
- >
- > On gatekeeper.dec.com in DEC/DECinfo/performance-summary there are some
- > performance summary papers. The following two papers are dated
- > Nov 20 1992 and seem to have current HP, Sun, and RS-6000 machines as
- > of that time:
- >
- > Do these papers in fact have the latest machines from the other vendors?
- >
- "Results" for the newest HP machines are incomplete, probably because they
- were unavailable at the time.
-
- SGI/MIPS was totally ignored. Given DEC's virtual abandonment of its
- MIPS-based line, my suspicion is that this was not simply an oversight.
-
-
-
- greg pavlov
- pavlov@fstrf.org
-