home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!ariel!davidsen
- From: davidsen@ariel.crd.GE.COM (william E Davidsen)
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Subject: Re: Def of a workstation (a lark)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.152453.13303@crd.ge.com>
- Date: 5 Jan 93 15:24:53 GMT
- References: <1993Jan3.052930.27869@wam.umd.edu> <1993Jan3.235327.13718@qb.rhein-main.de>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Reply-To: davidsen@crd.ge.com (bill davidsen)
- Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center, Schenectady NY
- Lines: 51
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ariel.crd.ge.com
-
- In article <1993Jan3.235327.13718@qb.rhein-main.de>, vhs@rhein-main.de (Volker Herminghaus-Shirai) writes:
-
- | (Additional menu items for move, resize, etc that are useless if you have
- | a mouse since no one in his sane mind would use them then.)
- | The video-mode desaster is another example. I have yet to see a workstation
- | that keeps switching between "text-mode" and a horrendous amount of
- | "graphics-modes" (except for the RS6000, which does text/graphics mode. Sigh.
-
- I have yet to see a non-accelerated workstation which did scrolling of
- text windows as fast as a dedicated text mode. Since you are moving less
- data with a hardware supported text mode it will always be faster,
- unless you deliberately cripple the hardware to make a point.
-
- I prefer to do long interractive editing (like writing articles and
- books) on a text screen because of this. It definitely has uses.
-
- | A decent workstation has IMHO *at least* the following items of which the
- | software can and does take advantage of:
- | a high-resolution screen
- | a pointing device
- | an ethernet connection (or token ring if your management was bribed ;-)
- | a UN*X operating system with TCP/IP support and a C compiler
- | a boot prom that allows for interactive diagnosis etc.
- | a decent amount of RAM and hard disk space
- | a tape drive for backups and data exchange as opposed to floppy disk
- | other items I may have forgotten (it's already tomorrow...;-)
- |
- | Software writers are usually driven to write for the lowest reasonable
- | common denominator, so if any of the above items don't exist in the base
- | configuration of a workstation line, forget at least 50% of their usefulness
- | if you have them. (E.g. >50 AIX or SCO UNIX installation disks vs. one tape.
- | Newer releases may give you one or two floppies and a tape, but still no
- | delivery on CD-ROM, as far as I see. Also no installing via ethernet, since
- | not everybody has it, etc.)
-
- Your "far as I can see" should get glasses. SCO has been shipping on
- CD for years, and Dell has been supporting network install for several
- years, too. For ease of install I would rate Dell first, then Sun and
- SCO tied, and HP-UX down a good bit from that.
-
- Sun beats SCO for ease of network setup, but that's because you can't
- offer choices without having either menus or prompts. Installing a smart
- net card on a Sun, like 4/670 for instance, a small server, is more
- complex than adding a net card to SCO.
-
- I can remember installing V7 on a PDP-11, and it startet with toggling
- the boot so the paper tape could be read to boot the magnetic media...
- we have made progress in the last few decades.
- --
- bill davidsen, GE Corp. R&D Center; Box 8; Schenectady NY 12345
- Keyboard controller has been disabled, press F1 to continue.
-