home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky co.general:2473 rec.skiing:9410 rec.travel:17602
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!kary
- From: kary@col.hp.com (Dan Kary)
- Newsgroups: co.general,rec.skiing,rec.travel
- Subject: Re: Amendment 2 Yet Again (was Re: Colorado Ski Report)
- Date: 11 Jan 1993 22:08:37 GMT
- Organization: HP Colorado Springs Division
- Lines: 19
- Message-ID: <1isr55INN3i3@hp-col.col.hp.com>
- References: <1993Jan11.180801.16256@den.mmc.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hplsdak.col.hp.com
-
- kbowles@den.mmc.com (mac bowles) writes:
- > Besides, science has shown that homosexuality is probably genetically based.
- > Therefore, homosexuality could not be a 'SIN', since it is a NATURAL part
- > of existence. If you call it a 'SIN', you are calling GOD a 'SINNER' or
- > that he is not perfect because he has made a mistake.
-
- I agree that biblical arguments against homosexuality are unimportant. Your
- genetic argument is equally unimportant. There is some scientific evidence
- that some people may be genetically predisposed to homosexuality. There is
- equally strong evidence that some people may be genetically predisposed to
- addictive/dependent behaviors such as alcoholism. I am not equating
- homosexuality and alcoholism. I am merely stating that the existence or
- non-existence of genetic evidence is not an argument that a behavior is
- good, bad, natural, unnatural, sinful, pure, etc.
-
- Dan Kary
-
- --
- "And that, my leige, is how we know the earth to be banana shaped."
-