home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky can.general:6211 can.politics:11178 talk.politics.animals:10709
- Newsgroups: can.general,can.politics,talk.politics.animals
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!geac!torsqnt!tmsoft!lsimages!cattnts!craig
- From: craig@cattnts.canada.ncr.com (Craig Campbell)
- Subject: Re: Eating killed animals (was Re: Gun Control Petition)
- Organization: AT&T / NCR Canada Ltd., Toronto, Canada
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 18:16:35 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.181635.19861@cattnts.canada.ncr.com>
- References: <1992Dec23.150404.29387@cdf.toronto.edu> <schuck.725650169@sfu.ca> <1992Dec31.165905.10759@tse.uucp>
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Dec31.165905.10759@tse.uucp> wayne@tse.uucp (Wayne Hines) writes:
-
- >Let's be reasonable. Comparing cattle castration to human medical treatment
- >is inaccurate and distorts Rosemary's argument. Cattle are castrated purely
- >for human gain - obviously they have no choice, and it is really not to their
- >benefit.
-
- Of course these are the same cattle that were conceived, born, fed, and
- raised purely for human gain. They are food. If they were not, they would
- not exist.
-
- > Wayne Hines
- --
- Craig Campbell | These opinions are entirely the result of a
- Systems Engineer | small butterfly crashing into the far side
- NCR Canada, | of the planet. Chaos Rules.
- an AT&T Company | I speak for no one, except, possibly, myself.
-