home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MCMAIL.CIS.MCMASTER.CA!DFRASER
- Return-Path: <@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU,
- @VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU:dfraser@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca>
- Message-ID: <Pine.2.4.9301070843.A25584@mcmail>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 08:18:28 -0500
- Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion list <IBM-MAIN@RICEVM1.BITNET>
- From: Doug Fraser <dfraser@MCMAIL.CIS.MCMASTER.CA>
- Subject: Re: Dangling VSAM truenames
- Comments: To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@VM1.CC.UAKRON.EDU>
- In-Reply-To: <199301070938.AA23905@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca>
- Lines: 25
-
- On Thu, 7 Jan 1993, Gregory Plucinski 257508 wrote:
-
- > > On Tue, 5 Jan 1993 14:41:00 PST,
- > > Gregory Plucinski 257508 <GRZES@PLWATU22.BITNET> said:
- > > > I think that someone use :
- > > > DELETE name CLUSTER
- > > > If you specify CLUSTER VSAM deletes only cluster (not DATA and INDEX,
- > > > i don't know why but it's )
- > >
- > > This is not true. Try it. DELETE CLUSTER deletes the cluster and all
- > > lower level related objects.
- > >
- > In my VSAM it's work as i wrote, i check it.
- > I use MVS/SP 1.3.6 may be it's to old ?
- > And of course ICF catalogs.
- >
- We had this problem several times years ago. It was caused by the
- security for the data and index being different than the security for the
- cluster. The person was allowed to delete the cluster but not the data
- and index. We use acf2 and it is based on dataset name. We stopped
- having this problem when the data and index names were aligned with the
- cluster names and the security rules. This probably is not the cause of
- your problem but ...
-
- Doug Fraser
-