home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!FAC.ANU.EDU.AU!ANDALING
- Return-Path: <@VMD.CSO.UIUC.EDU,@vmd.cso.uiuc.edu:andaling@durras.anu.edu.au>
- Message-ID: <9301121018.AA18790@fac.anu.edu.au>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 21:18:43 EST
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: Avery Andrews <andaling@FAC.ANU.EDU.AU>
- Subject: slow feedback reference bungled
- Lines: 18
-
- [Avery Andrews 9201112.2108]
-
- The reference to the excesive slowness of feedback is actually:
-
- Jordan and Rosenbaum (1989) `Action', in Posner, ed. _Foundations
- of Cognitive Science_, pps. 731, 746. This paper also cites some
- very suspect-looking work by Kelso and others that is supposed to
- support a concept of `coordinative structures' (what seems to be going
- on is low level configuration/relationship control between
- articulators).
-
- I guess the obvious question to ask about any movements that do look
- too fast for feedback is how they go under novel or unpredictable
- dynamic conditions. E.g. how does the concert pianist make out with
- lead weights attached to her fingers.
-
-
- Avery.Andrews@anu.edu.au
-