home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!jabaru.cec.edu.au!csource!gateway
- From: Geoff.C..Marshall@f159.n633.z3.fidonet.org (Geoff C. Marshall)
- Newsgroups: aus.sf
- Subject: Re: Books wot I have read
- Message-ID: <726815770.AA02500@csource.oz.au>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1993 22:12:00
- Sender: gateway@csource.oz.au
- Lines: 27
-
- bi> ....... it would seem as _The Forever War_ was the anti-war antidote to
- bi> Heinlein's _Starship Troopers_. _Starship Troopers_ has its gung-ho
- bi> marines exterminate aliens whilst protecting (human) life, liberty and
- bi> the American Way. _The Forever War_ depict a dehumanising pointless
- bi> struggle for pointless aims, much like the movie _Dark Star_, another
- bi> anti-Vietnam SF work.
-
- I think you missed the point in both books. In "The Forever War" the war
- was necessary, because of a total failure of understanding between two races
- (ever tried to argue for the separation of Church and State with a Sheite
- Muslim ?), while in "Starship Troopers" there was no glorification of war
- per se, just the viewpoint that if you support a given "state" or "nation",
- and want the right to make decisions about its direction (i.e. vote) then
- you should be prepared to act on its behalf. In my personal opinion both
- those who went to Vietnam and those who actively opposed it (such as Simon
- Townshend) were heroes. Both put their liberty (if not their lives) on the
- line for their beliefs.
-
- In "The Forever War", Mandella and Potter were caught up in something they
- did not believe in, and could not escape it - but they did not try to fight
- it. In "Starship Troopers" the hero joined a "peace time" army ONLY for the
- sake of personal advantage, but learnt otherwise.
-
- Count.
-
-
- * Origin: The Gate - Melbourne, Australia - +61-3-879-9082 (3:633/159.0)
-