Subject: Re: Supposed Talmud quotes (was Re: Almah in Isa 7:14)
Message-ID: <141770.2B4B6601@paranet.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 6 Jan 93 16:16:46 GMT
Sender: ufgate@paranet.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 8:7002/1.0
Lines: 30
BK> In other words, Harvey's citation is gibberish. I also made a
BK> second claim:
In other words you are just a cultic individual who attacks the individual rather than dialogue on the claims it self. An ol trick Bruce but not very acceptable.
>> Sorry copied the wrong reference.. The references are to a
15th century
>> Talmud, that is in Aramaic, and Hebrew... and was not
translated into
>> english.
I don't understand Bruce i gave you the references in Torah and Tanakh for you to look up. are you lazy or something or just plain beligerant...
BK> Then, Harvey reveals some truth:
BK> Aha. Here we have it. The "Talmudic quotes" that Harvey gave
BK> are in fact _not_ from the Talmud! If they're from an old
BK> document of some sort, fine, that's interesting, but why have
BK> you claimed that they're from the Talmud?
Not true Bruce, they are from the Talmud as researched by Oxford University in
England... If i could get there i would hop on a flight and do the research first hand. But instead i must wait for a collegue who teaches at Oxford, to come up with the info and you will be the first to know. That is reasonable isn't it?
And you are being very intellectually dishonest Bruce, as you know the references i gave you are in fact in the Talmud, and we will pull them out for all to see. But i bet you won't apolygize thats for sure.