home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!sugar!tghost!unkaphaed!popec
- From: popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Subject: Re: Bush's Pardons
- Message-ID: <Za45wB4w165w@unkaphaed.gbdata.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 02:26:34 GMT
- References: <C0JCoK.2zC@unix.portal.com>
- Organization: Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX
- Lines: 76
-
- mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz) writes:
-
- > Tom Perigrin (tip@lead.aichem.arizona.edu) wrote:
- > (not to me :)
- > : Okay, let me ask you to your twisted face:
- >
- >
- > : do you think that we should
- > : ignore all laws about perjury, lying to congress, and such? If
- > : so, there goes any pretense of this being a country of law. Besides
- > : note that the law is "lying to congress", not "lying to congresscritters".
- > : Shouldn't we have some respect for the institution, if not the individuals.
- > : For example, I have respect for the office of the vice president, even
- > : if a boob currently occupies the chair. And even if I think that the
- > : VP is a boob, I shouldn't be exempted from laws which pertain to his
- > : office (if there are any).
- > :
- >
- > There are often very good reasons to lie to congress. Congress is a seive,
- > and that says enough about why. And the real pair of boobs will be sworn
- > in soon enough. And we'll all know how overwhelming the job will be for
- > them soon thereafter.
- >
- > :
- > : >I have more admiration for a man who is willing to be scorned by the
- > : >whiners of an entire country in order to right something that he
- > : >actually believes in, than I have for someone who votes for things that
- > : >he knows are wrong simply for political gain.
- > :
- > :
- > : At last, we agree on something. I too have admiration for Walsh, who
- > : is willing to ignore the whining of the republican party while trying
- > : to right the wrongs committed by reagan/bush/quayle.
- > :
- > :
- >
- >
- > yeah yeah yeah...
- >
- > :
- > : Humor aside, the main 'arguement' you advanced was "they are doing it too"
- > : which doesn't make it right for the White House to engage in the that
- > : behaviour which you so rightly condemn in the congress. You used the term
- > : "robbing a mugger". Even if the victim (?) is a mugger, that doesn't
- > : excuse the robbery. It is still a crime, and most lower court judges would
- > : LAUGH at a defense plea "But your honor, the defendant was doing it as
- > : a civil service!".
- >
- >
- > No, the argument is that they are doing it too, and should be equally harasse
- > Fair is fair :)
-
-
- Well, if it's OK to pardon Perjurers, Criminals, and Lawbreakers that
- aided and abetted Bush & Reagan in their illegal schemes, It should then
- be OK that the others get off too, huh? Fair is fair, now ain't it?
- But that ain't what you seem to argue for. I hope personally, that
- Walsh hangs bush's ass on a stick. To excuse the massive lawbreaking of
- the White House by whining about other alledged acts of criminality is
- stupid. The Ketaing 5 is a good example. Wrist slaps for 4 senators and
- a rebuke for the one (CRanston), leaving office anyway. But that DOES
- NOT excuse the perjuries, criminal acts, coverups and pardons of the
- White House. To say it does which essentially is your view is morally
- corrupt. Now you don't want people on the net to think you are morally
- corrupt and want the White House Creeps to actually get away with their
- morally corrupt dirty tricks, do you?
-
-
-
-
- Pope Charles
-
- --
- popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (William C. Barwell)
- Unka Phaed's UUCP Thingy, Houston, TX, (713) 481-3763
- 1200/2400/9600/14400 v.32bis/v.42bis
-