home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:11892 alt.rush-limbaugh:13292 talk.politics.misc:66662
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!ncr-sd!crash!mdc
- From: mdc@crash.cts.com (Milo D. Cooper)
- Subject: Re: Your own words, of course != bigot
- Organization: CTS Network Services (crash, ctsnet), El Cajon, CA
- Distribution: usa, world
- Date: 07 Jan 93 20:25:55 PST
- Message-ID: <1993Jan07.202555.14982@crash>
- References: <1992Dec31.232748.9736@jcnpc.cmhnet.org> <1993Jan01.180401.23989@crash> <1i38ivINNrgp@network.ucsd.edu>
- Lines: 111
-
- In article <1i38ivINNrgp@network.ucsd.edu> triley@weber.ucsd.edu (Tristan Riley) writes:
- ~In article <1993Jan01.180401.23989@crash> mdc@crash.cts.com (Milo D. Cooper) writes:
- ~>
- ~> On the contrary, Mr. McAngus, I can safely point out that the
- ~>abolition of slavery was a good thing, especially since I'm a black male.
- ~>Only a political anarchist would dare declare that ethics and morals are
- ~>beyond judgment. Please support this assertion of your's with a lucid and
- ~>obvious example or two, or better yet, prove my submission that slavery
- ~>is immoral false.
- ~McAngus' point (as i understand it) was not that
- ~morals are "beyond judgement"
- ~but that there is no transcendental standard upon which to erect
- ~them (unless you're the kind of neo-fascist christian who thinks
- ~you've got the answers for everybody and you'd like to tell every
- ~other culture in the world which happens to adhere to different
- ~definitions of morality that they're WRONG and better change their
- ~ways or go to hell--or better yet we'll come over with our little
- ~missionaries and whip ol' christ into you).
-
- As can be read in later articles, this was not, in fact,
- McAngus' point. What is this tripe about there being no evident
- basis for the discerning of what is and what is not moral? How
- many of us, including criminals themselves, believe that theft is
- ethical? Murder? Rape? Before the British invasion of India,
- Indian women used to commit suicide upon the deaths of their hus-
- bands under the belief that life without one's male mate was not
- worth continuing. Sounds pretty immoral to me, unless your value
- of human life in general is inferior to my own.
-
- ~ morality is culturally
- ~relative and historically specific--this is why the same kind of
- ~morons citing r. limburger now re: the moral incorrectness of
- ~homosexuality were 150 years ago whipping your ancestors and
- ~citing god's eternal system of morality as justification for
- ~"keeping the darkies in their place." the simple fact is that
- ~slavery was quite moral in the minds of lots of slave owners--you
- ~are indulging in a quite a bit of egocentric (not to mention
- ~feeble) argumentation to
- ~imply that your self-interest as "a black male" creates moral ground
- ~for one action while the self-interest of gays and lesbians who are
- ~interested in the same freedom from persecution cannot do likewise
- ~because you have decided their morality is faulty.
-
- All the more support for my argument that what a society per-
- ceives as moral does not make it so. Slavery was ultimately eradi-
- cated because it is highly unethical. Morality is about as relative
- as the human race's perception of the color of a clear night sky. Mor-
- ality is not subject to historical or cultural beliefs. Morality exists
- in itself and it is up to us to discover that which is moral and that
- which is not, not the converse. Only _interpretation_ of morality is
- subjective. The truth fills my head, the truth fills my head. America
- is the most stark representation of this fact. Here we have amassed
- far more cultures than any other in recorded history, and yet we can all
- exist under the finest grasp of morality yet achieved. That grasp is
- not ideal, but it is certainly more solid than any in the Middle East,
- where people of different racial backgrounds harbor visceral hatred
- toward one another for no substantiated reason. My best friend is Is-
- raeli. He can't stand Arabs. He has no good reason for his spite.
- But he damn sure prefers America to Israel.
-
- ~someone else writes:
- ~
- ~Prove to me that butt fucking is a legitimate expression of
- ~>by vociferous groups or not.
- ~
- ~to whom i would answer: prove to me that vagina fucking is a
- ~legitimate expression of love between a man and a woman.
- ~
- ~Milo continues:
- ~
- ~ legitimacy and morality are
- ~>not always subject to mutually synonymous definitions. To cry out
- ~>in disgust using foul language is a legitimate display of anger, but
- ~>to do so before children is immoral.
- ~>
- ~what are you talking about here? immoral TO YOU. i hate to break
- ~the news to you, but there is no schematic grid all humans are born
- ~with in their brains which tell them "cursing in front of the kids
- ~is immoral."
- ~
- ~alexander
-
- You are more and more revealing your misunderstanding of
- human nature. Like I said, the definition of morality is acquired,
- not inborn. It is our responsibility to expose that which is immoral.
- Morality does NOT conform to culture or history. If you believe
- otherwise, then you cannot believe that all people deserve to be
- treated equally, because you must condone any heinous act thought
- to be morally acceptable, for you believe there is no universal and
- timeless method of application of ethics. Just because we humans
- possess no innate knowledge of an idea does not allow our everlasting
- ignorance of it, and I think you know that. We have found that to
- steal is immoral. We have found that to rape is immoral. We have
- found that to judge someone solely by his skin hue is immoral. Yet
- we were born realizing none of these things. Foul language is quite
- often a stimulant of negative human reaction; this is because we know
- that people utter four-letter words usually when they are experiencing
- negative emotions, emotions so negative that they impair one's abili-
- ty to maintain self-control and/or to express oneself clearly. This
- produces a necessary level of fear, however significant or insignifi-
- cant, in anyone within earshot. If I am upset, then I would want my
- children to know exactly with whom and why I am upset, rather than
- simply spouting of a "F*CK" or two and thereby rousing their trepidity.
- Also, I would want them to do the same. I can promote this by NOT
- utilizing foul language. Would you hire a babysitter with a free tongue,
- or one that exercised restraint in her vocal expression?
-
- _m d c_
- Milo D. Cooper '92 | 1992 | mdc@crash.cts.com
- `-------'
- -------------------------------- end of file ----------------------------------
-