home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:11780 talk.politics.misc:66529
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!scifi!watson!fenway.aix.kingston.ibm.com!mjones
- From: mjones@fenway.aix.kingston.ibm.com (Mike Jones)
- Subject: Re: Conservative Values (Re: New group proposal: alt.conservative.forum)
- Sender: @watson.ibm.com
- Message-ID: <1993Jan06.235447.13927@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jan 93 23:54:47 GMT
- References: <C0D6CF.IG7@unix.portal.com>
- Organization: IBM T. J. Watson Research
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
- Lines: 69
-
- mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz) writes:
- : Russ Anderson (rja@mahogany126.cray.com) wrote:
- : : In <C02Mws.CtK@unix.portal.com>, mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz) writes:
- : : > Mike Jones (mjones@fenway.aix.kingston.ibm.com) wrote:
- : : > : mykes@shell.portal.com (mike myke schwartz) writes:
- : : > : : The most successful governmental
- : : > : : economic policies in this century, known as trickle-down, were a Kemp/Reagan
- : : > : : implementation. Reagan's terms not only produced enormous prosperity and
- : : > : : growth, but year after year the debt and defecit as a percentage of
- : : > : : GDP _decreased_ (source: Milton Friedman, interviewd on Wall Street Week).
- : : > :
- : : > : This claim is so vague as to be meaningless. It is true that you can pick
- : : > : starting and ending points to illustrate this fact, but there's no independent
- : : > : reason to pick those points. If you take "the 80's" (1980-1989), or "the
- : : > : Reagan years (1980-1988), that isn't a true statement. (I'll welcome FACTS
- : : > : to prove me wrong, because I don't have the numbers handy.) The growth was
- : : > : largely fueled by massive increases in public and private debt, which has
- : : > : been very much responsible for the mess we're in now.
- : : >
- : : > I did not video tape Wall Street Week, nor do I have a transcript of it.
- : : > The best of my recollection is what I wrote. I apologize for saying that
- : : > the DEBT decreased. But the defecit did indeed decrease. Since you ask
- : : > me to do your research for you, I will provide you with the data, as found
- : : > in my 1992 Universal Almanac. All dollar figures are in BILLIONS.
- : : >
- : : > 1980 GNP 2732.0, defecit = 73.8, %GNP = .0270
- : : > 1985 GNP 4014.9, defecit = 212.3, %GNP = .0529
- : : > 1987 GNP 4536.7, defecit = 148.0, %GNP = .0327
- : : > 1988 GNP 4864.3, defecit = 155.1, %GNP = .0319
- : : > 1989 GNP 5200.8, defecit = 152.0, %GNP = .0292
- : :
- : : Mike, unless you plan on arguing that .0270 > .0292, you just disproved your
- : : own assertion.
- : :
- : : The deficit as a percentage of GNP was higher at the end of the 1980's than
- : : it was at the start of the 1980's.
- : :
- :
- : Russ, the assertion was made that the defecit DID not decrease at all,
- : as %GNP, and someone questioned Milton Friedman's claim that it did. It did.
- : In fact, the consistent yearly decrease from 85-89 was deliberate and
- : healthy.
-
- In fact, my assertion (left in the mass above) was that there is no
- meaningful way to claim this. Yes, you can pick two points and show a
- decline, but why did you pick those points? The 85-89 (or sometimes -90)
- points are often chosen by Reaganista True Believers, but I've always been
- puzzled by why they seem to be able to swallow the idea that it took four
- years for Reagan to turn around what they claim were Carter problems (with
- the help of a Republican senate, no less!), but no time at all for that
- noted socialist George Bush to make hash out of the goodness which flowed
- from the pen of Saint Ron.
-
- : The assertion that defecit spending is the cause of any problems is false.
- : Tell that to people who buy homes with mortgages of (at least) 4x their
- : gross earnings. The assertion that defecit spending every year is bad is
- : also false. If, yearly, you get a $100/month pay raise ($1200/year), you
- : do indeed have the ability to pay $100/month on new debt costs.
-
- The assertion that deficit spending is the cause of no problems is equally
- false. Neither has been made here recently.
-
- Mike Jones | AIX/ESA Development | mjones@donald.aix.kingston.ibm.com
-
- As a professional humorist, I often get letters from readers who are
- interested in the basic nature of humor. "What kind of a sick perverted
- disgusting person are you," these letters typically ask, "that you make jokes
- about setting fire to a goat?" ...
- - Dave Barry, "Why Humor is Funny"
-