home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:11529 talk.politics.misc:66240
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ennews!anasaz!john
- From: john@anasazi.com (John R. Moore)
- Subject: Re: Conservative? Hahaha....
- Reply-To: john@anasazi.com
- Organization: Anasazi, Inc. Phoenix, Arizona USA
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 05:45:14 GMT
- Message-ID: <1993Jan5.054514.13633@anasazi.com>
- References: <C08L2F.I7F@ddsw1.mcs.com> <1993Jan2.181304.20185@anasazi.com> <1993Jan4.093238.25382@hemlock.cray.com>
- Sender: usenet@anasazi.com (Usenet News)
- Lines: 21
-
- Keywords:
-
- In article <1993Jan4.093238.25382@hemlock.cray.com> rja@mahogany126.cray.com (Russ Anderson) writes:
- ]> The Colorado Law reduced the number of laws (by prohibiting certain forms
- ]> of special group protection laws). As such, it fits with the criteria
- ]> you give for conservatives. Hypocritical? Not at all!
- ]
- ]Would a Constitutional amendment prohibiting any laws to protect private
- ]property also fit the criteria of "Conservative"? After all, it would
- ]reduce the number of laws (like laws agains theft, etc).
- No.
- ]
- ]How do the two amendments differ?
- Russ, I thought better of you. It is completely obvious how they differ.
-
-
- --
- John Moore NJ7E, 7525 Clearwater Pkwy, Scottsdale, AZ 85253 (602-951-9326)
- john@anasazi.com ncar!noao!asuvax!anasaz!john anasaz!john@asuvax.eas.asu.edu
- - - If a field of study has the word "science" in it - it isn't a science - -
- - - Support ALL of the bill of rights, INCLUDING the 2nd amendment! - -
-