home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!eff-gate!usenet
- From: U15289@UICVM.UIC.EDU
- Subject: Re: Question on sexual harassment
- Message-ID: <199301051752.AA13842@eff.org>
- Originator: daemon@eff.org
- Sender: U15289@UICVM.UIC.EDU
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
- Organization: EFF mail-news gateway
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 17:25:17 GMT
- Approved: usenet@eff.org
- Lines: 22
-
- WRT Jim Thomas' hypothetical on a fabricated pornographic GIF of an actual
- woman: it might be actionable as a reputational tort (slander, libel) or as a
- privacy tort (presentation in a false light). Both the GIF itself, and the
- associated communications to the woman depicted, might or might not violate
- internal regulations of the university computer center regarding prohibited
- uses of the system. (The dissemination of viruses, _per se_, would probably
- constitute such a violation, as would the use of email and/or other aspects
- of the net for purposes of personal harassment, assuming that the actions in
- question were held to be that.)
-
- Intuitively, however, I do not think that any of this fits the commonly used,
- formal definition of sexual harassment, however offensive the woman in question
- may happen to find it. For one thing, the fact that the woman is non-universi-
- ty, in itself, takes it out of the reach of university regulations on sexual
- harassment; by the same token, the creator of the GIF would probably be outside
- the jurisdiction of the in-house regulations of any other place where its
- circulation might have the practical effect of rendering the environment host-
- ile for the woman.
-
- Mitch Pravatiner
- U15289@uicvm.uic.edu
- (not licensed to practice law)
-