home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!linus!linus.mitre.org!mwunix!m23364
- From: m23364@mwunix (James Meritt)
- Subject: Re: Department of Energy nominee
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.212631.22109@linus.mitre.org>
- Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mwunix.mitre.org
- Organization: MITRE Corporation, McLean VA
- References: <1992Dec22.133257.3521@linus.mitre.org> <1992Dec22.201100.9106@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 21:26:31 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Dec22.201100.9106@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> gsh7w@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy) writes:
- }James Meritt writes:
- }#Question: In you opinion, what conclusions may you draw from these facts
- }#on the validity of the statement "get best qualified for the position"
- }#posturing, and what is the likelihod that the decisive consideration was
- }#NOT experience in the appointed position's functions?
- }
- }It tells me that Clinton is going to return the Department of Energy
- }into something useful, as opposed to its purpose for the past 12 years
- }of making the DoD expenditures look cheaper by having the DoE make
- }the nukes.
-
- Pop test two: When was the last nuke made (by DoE)?
-
- Hint: Been a long time. Hence, the "line item" has been for other purposes.
-
-
-