home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.women
- Path: sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!acp
- From: acp@cray.com (Anthony Peterson)
- Subject: Re: Living in a State of Siege
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.102959.20573@hemlock.cray.com>
- Lines: 10
- Nntp-Posting-Host: palm24
- Organization: Cray Research, Inc.
- References: <1992Dec23.074553.20000@cs.ucla.edu> <1h9p4iINN6kj@transfer.stratus.com>
- Date: 23 Dec 92 10:29:59 CST
-
- In article <1h9p4iINN6kj@transfer.stratus.com> lmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com writes:
- >
- >Of course it's intrinsically bad. But if you're a man, you're not
- >likely to be killed by your SO in your own home as it were. (Again,
- >I'm not saying men are never killed by their SOs in their home, just
- >that, statistically, it happens more often to WOMEN than to MEN.)
- >
- Just because more women than men are killed by their SO's does
- not mean that they're "likely" to be killed by their SO's.
-
-