home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.women
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!mont!mizzou1.missouri.edu!SURGDM
- From: Diane
- Subject: Re: thermal underpants
- Message-ID: <168C4E567.SURGDM@mizzou1.missouri.edu>
- Sender: news@mont.cs.missouri.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mizzou1.missouri.edu
- Organization: University of Missouri
- References: <1992Dec21.202818.18401@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 92 16:18:41 CST
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1992Dec21.202818.18401@cbnewsk.cb.att.com>
- krw@cbnewsk.cb.att.com (keith.r.smith) writes:
-
- <stuff deleted>
-
- >I compares the "specs" on a number of differrent brands, with their
- >own separate sizing schemes, and determined that a women's small should
- >fit me properly. I opened a package. The legs looked long enough,
- >(I stand 5'11") they looked about big enough around in the thighs and
- >in the hips, and the waistband looked just-right! The only thing missing
- >
- <more stuff deleted>
-
- >I can't help but think that _one day_ the folx who make athletic gear
- >(you know, those garments that _have to_ fit men/women of athletic
- >proportions), would get together with the folx that make thermal undies,
- >and a KILLING would be made!
- >
- >What do ya' think, folx?
- >
- >Keith R
-
- Well Keith, I think you did a very nice job of explaining the women's
- undies in your sock drawer. *Now* how are you going to explain the
- bra and fishnet hose in the box at the bottom of your closet???
- ;-)
-
- Diane
-