home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.culture.japan
- Path: sparky!uunet!ulowell!cs.ulowell.edu!cshi
- From: cshi@cs.ulowell.edu (Chunde Shi)
- Subject: Re: Comfort girls?
- Message-ID: <C072K8.3p4@ulowell.ulowell.edu>
- Sender: usenet@ulowell.ulowell.edu (News manager - ulowell)
- Organization: University of Massachusetts at Lowell Computer Science
- References: <BzzB3z.EJG@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <11646.9212301418@csparc12.scs.leeds.ac.uk> <1i15rhINN90v@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 21:33:44 GMT
- Lines: 11
-
- In article <1i15rhINN90v@shelley.u.washington.edu> yeonwook@hardy.u.washington.edu (Mark Choi) writes:
- >overseeing such military brothel operations. On the other hand, it is known
- >for a fact that the American government didn't encourage the use of sex
- ***************************************
- Nosense! YOu do not need to encourage anybody to have sex. Sex was used by
- bothj Japanese and U.S. millitary as weapon to degrade the occupied people. It was
- physically forced in former case, it was finacailly, or dietorily forced
- in the later case. By " finacailly, or dietorily", I mean, in the example of
- occupied germany, japan, and vietnam, local people were not supplied(generated)
- enough food, or welth, while G.I. had plentity, local young femal had to do
- it for servival.
-