home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!cayman!mary
- From: mary@Cayman.COM (Mary Malmros)
- Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
- Subject: Re: sea salt versus "table" salt
- Message-ID: <MARY.92Dec30174438@martinique.Cayman.COM>
- Date: 30 Dec 92 22:44:38 GMT
- References: <1992Dec30.180255.20998@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>
- Sender: news@cayman.COM
- Followup-To: sci.med.nutrition
- Organization: Cayman Systems Inc., Cambridge, MA
- Lines: 21
- Nntp-Posting-Host: martinique
- In-reply-to: kalin@cbnewsm.cb.att.com's message of 30 Dec 92 18:02:55 GMT
-
-
- In article <1992Dec30.180255.20998@cbnewsm.cb.att.com> kalin@cbnewsm.cb.att.com (andrew.j.kalinowitsch) writes:
-
-
- are there any health benefits derived from using
- sea salt over regular table salt?
-
- and what's so bad about table salt anyway?
-
- [followups to sci.med.nutrition]
-
-
- Unless I'm mistaken, sea salt contains naturally occuring iodide, which, as
- the salt boxes say, is a "necessary nutrient" ;-) . Salt from
- other sources does not, unless it's been added. If it has been, there's
- no difference, as far as I know.
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Mary Malmros | Cayman Systems Inc, 26 Landsdowne St, Cambridge, MA 02139
- mary@cayman.com | Phone 617-494-1999 Fax 617-494-5167 AppleLink CAYMAN.TECH
-
-