home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: gph@hpcc01.corp.hp.com (G. Paul Houtz)
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 17:37:50 GMT
- Subject: Re: "Rainforest Destruction Has Many Victims"
- Message-ID: <4320103@hpcc01.corp.hp.com>
- Organization: the HP Corporate notes server
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!news.dtc.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpcc05!hpcc01!gph
- Newsgroups: rec.woodworking
- References: <ACTIV-L.19Dec1992.1347@naughty-peahen>
- Lines: 32
-
- billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
- >hubcap@hubcap.clemson.edu (System Janitor) writes:
- >:
- >: I've heard that (about) 95% of the deforestation is attributable to indigenous
- >: personnel slash-and-burning for farmland (which is only good for a couple
- >: of years, and then they move on), and only 5% is due to any kind of
- >: organized timber industry.
- >:
- >: True? BS?
-
-
- One of the reasons why locals (re: the corrupt governments) encourage
- slash and burn is because they do not see immediate gain from
- a sustainable practice. By buying woods only from sustainable sources
- you encourage the use of existing rainforests. By buying from
- non-renewable sources, you actually encourage locals to slash and
- burn, because there is no economic incentive for them to preserve the
- forest. They can make a faster buck by clearing the land and raising
- beef on it for export.
-
-
- >This is certainly true in Brazil. I don't know about all the other
- >countries. Another fact - the rate of deforestation in Brazil has
- >been at the rate of 0.5%/year.
-
- Could you please cite a reference for this "fact"?
-
- >The greatest worry is loss of topsoil.
-
- I hate to say it, Bill, but this sounds more like an opinion.
- I have heard a number of experts indicate that loss of the forest
- and species diversity is the greatest worry.
-