home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.video.satellite
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.mentorg.com!mentorg.com!philip
- From: philip@mentorg.com (Philip Peake)
- Subject: BBC WSTV
- Sender: news@news.mentorg.com (News User)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.220625.16957@news.mentorg.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 22:06:25 GMT
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sun_shine.mentorg.com
- Organization: Mentor Graphics
- Keywords:
- Followup-To:
- Lines: 85
-
- I listened to the WS 'phone-in, and was (pleasantly) surprised to hear
- a call which was almost word for word what was proposed in this group.
-
- The reply was predictable (as well as dissapointing).
-
- For those who don't know, I will try to explain how the BBC
- operates, so that you can better understand their problems, and
- the problems faced in trying to get BBC programing into the USA.
- Most of this is from memory, and so probably not 100% correct.
-
- The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is an independent entity,
- funded by listeners and viewers in the United Kingdom. Revenue is raised
- by a TV licence fee, payable by anyone owning a TV in the UK.
-
- You could view this as a "targeted" tax.
-
- Towards the end of the British Empire days, the BBC extended its coverage
- to basically cover the world - at this point 1/5 of the worlds' population
- had the right to a British passport - and were supposed to be - and maybe
- even were - interested in what the BBC had to say.
-
- As the empire went the way of all empires (good and bad) the British
- govenment decided that the BBS world service was basically a "good thing",
- and decided to fund it seperately. There is a grant from the government
- which now pays for the BBC world service radio.
-
- Then, along came Maggie "Great Britain Ltd" Thatcher, who's basic philisophy
- would make Ronald Regan look like a raving communist. She wanted (wants)
- Britain to be run like a corporation, and if things are not profitable, then
- if not indispensable for other reasons - flush them.
-
- The BBC was faced with various propositions, including going fully commercial.
- Obviously, the existing commercial TV companies were less than delighted
- by this idea, and managed to tone down the idea. However, some movement
- on the part of the BBC part was required. BBC Enterprises was set up, with
- the task of taking old, worn out, radio shows and selling them to other parts
- of the world - the idea seemed to work, and produced some income for the BBC
- to offset some of the license fee increases which would have been required.
- The idea was soon extended to selling old, worn out, TV programs - that worked
- too.
-
- Fairly recently, satellite TV took off, and a natural assumption was that
- the BBC world service would get lots more money to extend into TV services.
-
- Instead, the government decided to create a new, UNFUNDED, enterprise;
- BBC World Service TV.
-
- So, we now have four arms to the BBC:
-
- BBC (domestic) - funded by a targeted tax.
- BBC world service - funded by a government grant.
- BBC enterprises - a money making organisation.
- BBC world service tv - unfunded (one day, for profit ?) organisation.
-
- BBC WSTV currently sells its programing.
- They are not in the TV buisness themselves, they form "partenerships"
- with other (local) companies who sell that programing to cable (or other)
- companies for distribution.
-
- BBC WSTV is currently News and documentary oriented, since the interesting
- (read saleable) programs are picked up by BBC enterprises, and sold
- individualy.
-
- I think that it takes little imagination to realise just how thrilled existing
- US companies are at the prospect of a "quality" news source being made available
- in the US. Not surprisingly, BBC WSTV are finding it very difficult to find
- a "partener" for US distribution - and even if they do, I wouldn't be surprised
- if that partener turned out to be cable company ...
-
- So, in short, if you are waiting to fing BBC WSTV floating around in the sky ...
- just don't hold your breath ...
-
- There seem to be two possible solutions:
-
- - Convince the British government that you don't make money out of
- cultural promotion (next to impossible, whilst the current
- governement is around).
-
- - Convince OPB to become the partener ...
- OPB really isn't too far from BBC programing as it is !
-
- I suppose that a third possibility is to learn German of French, because
- they really do believe in spreading their culture around.
-
- Philip
-