home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.video.production
- Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!nwickham
- From: nwickham@nyx.cs.du.edu (Neal Wickham)
- Subject: Re: TBC use
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.114218.29377@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University
- of Denver for the Denver community. The University has neither
- control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users.
- Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account)
- Reply-To: nwickham@nyx.UUCP (Neal Wickham)
- Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept.
- References: <1hs96kINN227@crcnis1.unl.edu> <C03p4t.Dyw@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 11:42:18 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <C03p4t.Dyw@news.cso.uiuc.edu> duvall@eagle.sangamon.edu (Mike Duvall) writes:
-
- >So gen lock has nothing to do with broadcast output. You cannot clean up
- >a crummy video signal. It is only as good as what you first record. TBCs
- >help keep a video signal stable and don't help the look of the picture.
- >If it is not broadcastable you can't make it. Garbage in and garbage out
- >no matter the TBC.
-
- ...but doesn't "boadcast quality" sort of have two meanings where one
- refers to the quality of the picture and the other refers to the quality
- of the signal. I mean, TV productions such as America's Funniest Videos
- or whatever, broadcast video from camcorders. They look like camcorder
- video... not high quality, but are legally broadcast. I guess my real
- question is, doesn't the FCC have some rules about the quality of
- broadcasted signals, and sometimes this is what people are refering to
- in broadcast quality?
-
- I am not the orignal poster in the thread, but thanks for the info.
-
-
-
- NCW
-
-