home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.sport.soccer
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.mentorg.com!gamma!johnc
- From: johnc@gamma.mentorg.com (John Crown)
- Subject: re: Rule suggestion: free kick delayed until the ball is lost
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.215201.16645@news.mentorg.com>
- Sender: johnc@gamma (John Crown)
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:52:01 GMT
- References: <9212211522.AA27369@cs.utexas.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gamma.mentorg.com
- Organization: Mentor Graphics
- Keywords:
- Followup-To:
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <9212211522.AA27369@cs.utexas.edu>, JZeevi%users%swri03@D26VS046A.CCF.SwRI.EDU writes:
- ||> ---------------------------
- ||> One sees often that the referee has it hard to choose, whether to whissle
- ||> a free kick or let the game continue after a foul.
- ||> ...
- ||> Would it be possible to delay the whissle until the fouling team gets the
- ||> ball as in hockey?
- |> ---------------------------
- |> There is a clause in the laws of the game that specifically directs the ref
- |> to not call a foul if, in his opinion, he is satisfied that doing so would
- |> result in giving the advantage to the offending team.
- |> ...
- |> josef
- |> jzeevi@swri.edu
-
- In the case of a foul that warrants a caution (yellow card), the referee may
- apply advantage, allowing play to continute without giving a free kick. The
- yellow card can then be shown when play has come to a stop. (See Law XII,
- IBD 6).
-
- \ | /
- === John Crown john_crown@mentorg.com
-