home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!cronkite.cisco.com!cisco.com!rgajendr
- From: rgajendr@cisco.com (I. Rajeev Gajendran)
- Newsgroups: rec.sport.cricket
- Subject: Re: 6 changes in NZ team vs. Pak
- Message-ID: <1h5te6INNjfg@cronkite.cisco.com>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 02:10:14 GMT
- References: <1992Dec21.204257.3062@grace.cri.nz>
- Organization: cisco Systems, Incorporated
- Lines: 47
- NNTP-Posting-Host: stout.cisco.com
-
- In article <1992Dec21.204257.3062@grace.cri.nz>, howard@grace.cri.nz (Howard Silby) writes:|>
-
- <stuff left out>
-
- |> I would like to take this opportunity to belatedly congratulate
- |> the Sri Lankan team on their resounding success recently and I hope
- |> they can host (or tour) other countries to demonstrate their
- |> under-recognised talents such as Roshan Mahanama. I believe under
- |> most conditions (not just home conditions) Sri Lanka could
- |> perform credibly (ie. win at least 3 or 4 games out of every 10)
- |> against any country in the world except perhaps England.
- |>
- |>
-
- The New Zealand contingent on the net has sounded uniformly surprised
- at what happened to the Kiwis in Sri Lanka - they shouldn't be. As has
- been pointed out before, Sri Lanka has had talented players for many
- decades before they attained Test status. I could tell you names but
- they wouldn't mean anything to you because you never saw them play. Not
- many r.s.c. people ever saw Warnapura and Tennekoon put on 169 runs
- against Tony Greig's MCC, or saw Roy Dias schooling Bob Willis in
- the first official tour by England. He hit him for five or six fours
- in one over - mostly his gorgeous, trademark, cover drives.
-
- The problem has never been talent, it has been lack of experience
- and (sometimes) discipline and dedication - as was amply demonstrated
- when the team was chasing a sub-200 total to beat the Australians in the
- recent Test, and wound up losing (I almost puked!). The lack of
- experience is because the ICC refused to grant the nation Test status
- until 1982. By a sad coincidence, that's right around when the
- communal troubles in the country became a full scale civil war, which,
- among other things, definitely put a damper on cricket tours to the island.
-
- At home Sri Lanka is very hard to beat. This is not because of cheating,
- umpiring, nasty crowds, or bomb threats. It is because at home the
- players are in a familiar environment, concentrate on the task at hand,
- and therefore play more to their potential. I do not know how the teams
- behave while abroad, but my guess is that the "island boys" are
- easily distracted by the exotic thrills of foreign lands. At home, I
- am prepared to bet that, right now, they could take 7 out of 10 ODIs
- from ANY team except, maybe, the West Indies and Pakistan. For some reason, up
- until the most recent series, they have always struggled against New Zealand.
- I have not watched them play in many years, but they have apparently
- developed into a formidable one-day side. If more frequent tours
- allow the core players to build up some good experience, they are going
- to surprise a lot of teams (and their supporters) in the next World Cup.
- You heard it here first.
-