home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky rec.photo:22854 ba.general:5455
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!sgiblab!sgigate!odin!fido!lunch.wpd.sgi.com!pdc
- From: pdc@lunch.wpd.sgi.com (Paul Close)
- Newsgroups: rec.photo,ba.general,sgi.general
- Subject: Re: Where to process my color negative film
- Date: 1 Jan 1993 18:51:33 GMT
- Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc., Mountain View, CA
- Lines: 23
- Distribution: ba
- Message-ID: <1i23rlINNgta@fido.asd.sgi.com>
- References: <1htpisINN2ho@fido.asd.sgi.com>
- Reply-To: pdc@sgi.com (Paul Close)
- NNTP-Posting-Host: lunch.wpd.sgi.com
- Originator: pdc@lunch.wpd.sgi.com
-
- John Eisenman (jice@echo.asd.sgi.com) writes:
- >I would like recommendations for fairly inexpensive but
- >reasonable places to have my file developed. I am not a
- >"real" photographer, so I don't need to interact much with
- >the lab, but I would like a place that will give me good
- >results and actually checks the results before giving the
- >prints to me.
-
- Well, it sounds dumb, but I always get my film developed at Target. It
- takes 2-3 days, but I've never had a problem. They're reasonably priced,
- too (read cheap :-). You don't get charged for prints that don't turn out,
- as you'd expect. This leads me to believe that somebody, somewhere,
- actually checks them out. The quality of the prints is consistently high
- (well, as high as the qulity of the negatives going in :-), and they use
- Kodak paper (If you care).
-
- They (well, the labs they send them to, of course) have a wide range of
- services, too, like enlargements and double prints, or glossy or matte
- finish. They even develop "panoramic" film....
- --
- Paul Close pdc@sgi.com ...!{ames, decwrl, uunet}!sgi!pdc
-
- No fate but what we make
-