home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.photo
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!ra.nrl.navy.mil!tse
- From: tse@ra.nrl.navy.mil (Anthony Tse)
- Subject: Re: Canon 10s Vs Nikon N90, Which one?
- Message-ID: <BzzIu0.5MB@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
- Sender: usenet@ra.nrl.navy.mil
- Organization: Naval Research Lab, Washington, DC
- References: <1992Dec28.161527.12775@eua.ericsson.se> <BzzBo5.3r9@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <1992Dec28.131003.28563@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:44:24 GMT
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <1992Dec28.131003.28563@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> acs@csri.toronto.edu (Alvin Chia-Hua Shih) writes:
- >Well, looking at my F1N brochure, I see an FD 20-35/3.5L and an FD
- >28-55/3.5-4.5. I don't see anything like an FD 24-35. So go for it! :-)
-
- Well, I had a FD 24-35L in my hand twice. Never seen a FD 20-35L.
- I think there is a missprint somewhere.
-
- -Anthony
-