home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / rec / photo / 22588 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-27  |  1.1 KB  |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: rec.photo
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!hp-cv!hp-pcd!hpcvaac!billn
  3. From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
  4. Subject: Re: "Signature Color" film -- what's the story?
  5. Message-ID: <1992Dec27.095751.21250@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>
  6. Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
  7. References: <BzExtH.7LG@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
  8. Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 09:57:51 GMT
  9. Lines: 16
  10.  
  11. berger@atropa (Mike Berger) writes:
  12. : mcovingt@aisun3.ai.uga.edu (Michael Covington) writes:
  13. : >With careful processing, it seems to work well.  However, I don't
  14. : >think it's due to the superiority of the film.  (Kodak has every
  15. : >incentive to sell good film to ordinary people, without going to
  16. : >roundabout means such as this.)  Rather, my guess is that it's due to
  17. : >the care that is taken with the processing and printing.
  18. : *----
  19. : Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if the film were superior.  After
  20. : all, it's designed for exquisite color and very substantial enlargement.
  21.  
  22. It is also designed for use in moving images. You would find, if you
  23. examined an individual image, that the grain is no better than standard
  24. consumer film.
  25.  
  26. Bill
  27.