home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!apple!goofy!michael.apple.com!ems
- From: ems@michael.apple.com (E. Michael Smith)
- Newsgroups: rec.org.mensa
- Subject: Re: midnight/noon AM/PM?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec15.213435.2396@michael.apple.com>
- Date: 15 Dec 92 21:34:35 GMT
- References: <01GSCK3O3Y1K9VXMSF@ccfvx3.draper.com>
- Organization: Circle 'C' Shellfish Ranch, Shores-of-the-Pacific, California
- Lines: 32
-
- In article <01GSCK3O3Y1K9VXMSF@ccfvx3.draper.com> skh4161@mvs.draper.com (Kjeld Hvatum) writes:
- >
- >>From: Roger Tipley <tipley@solo.eng.hou.compaq.com>
- >
- >>We all agree which day the times 23:59:59.9 and 00:00:00.1 belong
- >>to (the first is obviously P.M. of one day and the second is A.M.
- >>of the next day). The argument is about which day the instant of
- >>midnight (24:00:00.000..) would be associated with.
-
- One answer would be: 24:00:00.000 is in the PM while 00:00:00.000 is AM ;-)
-
- >The practical answer is that digital clocks switch the day when they
- >roll over all the digits. Since digital clocks usually don't display
- >fractions of a second, 12:00:00 a.m. is what they display for the whole
- >first second of the new day. It would be awkward to switch the day one
- >second after the new day had started.
- >
- >If you want to split mathematical hairs, argue about how it's
- >possible for 11:59:59.99999... p.m. of the old day and
- >12:00:00.00000... a.m. of the new day to be the same. :-)
-
- I think I've answered that above 8-}
-
- Live life on the edge, but watch out for sharp cusps ...
- --
-
- E. Michael Smith ems@apple.COM
-
- 'Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has
- genius, power and magic in it.' - Goethe
-
- I am not responsible nor is anyone else. Everything is disclaimed.
-