home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.music.compose
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!hermes.chpc.utexas.edu!cfi.org!dogface!joe
- From: joe@dogface.austin.tx.us (Joe Zitt)
- Subject: Re: How does one compose?
- Organization: The Fortress of Ultimate Dorkiness
- Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 04:12:11 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Dec25.041211.27936@dogface.austin.tx.us>
- References: <o591VB1w165w@dorsai.com> <1992Dec21.135542.2877@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> <85767@ut-emx.uucp>
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <85767@ut-emx.uucp> james@astro.as.utexas.edu (James McCartney) writes:
- > I think the question is whether a new compositional device is used
- >out of expressive need or just because it can be done. I think both are
- >valid. Though if someone continually produces pieces of the second type
- >I would say they are a compositional geek. The Schoenberg 12-tone system
- >was useful as a hammer. It did open new territory. But I think that once
- >the wall is broken, the hammer should be thrown away.
-
- But remember that a lot of good music can come from a continual quest
- for new hammers. I find that a lot of my best stuff comes from coming
- across new compositional procedures (and , pace idealord, I find that
- a lot of the most interesting challenges come from the need to create
- music from available materials). For example, the music for my show
- <Shekhinah The Presence> (about which I've been nattering endlessly
- elsewhere) came from the challenge of creating an entire score
- exclusively through manipulations of live and recorded voices, Each of
- the pieces had, in a sense, a compositional problem and an algorithm
- that solved it.
-
- One of these days I'd love to do a piece for a large orchestra... but
- if I don't have a shot at access to an orchestra, I'd be wasting my
- time.
-