home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!rochester!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!el0g+
- From: el0g+@andrew.cmu.edu (Erik Lauer)
- Newsgroups: rec.games.netrek
- Subject: Re: Dogfight Size wars
- Message-ID: <ofBeLUi00VB=8NkUUt@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 05:21:36 GMT
- References: <lyodav.724638494@vincent1.iastate.edu>
- <1gul34INN36t@charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu>
- <lyodav.724899627@vincent2.iastate.edu>
- <JIVE.92Dec21124815@spanky.ssc.gov>
- Organization: Doctoral student, Mathematics, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Lines: 30
- In-Reply-To: <JIVE.92Dec21124815@spanky.ssc.gov>
-
- jive@spanky.ssc.gov (Jim Ivey) {FillInTheBlank} writes:
-
- >> Ogging Bombing Planets
- >>1) CA SC DD
- >>2) DD DD AS
- >>3) SC AS SC
- >
- > Well, your chart seems reasonable, though I'd fault it in a couple of
- >areas.
- >
- > Ogging Bombing Planets
- >1) CA SC SC
- >2) SC DD CA
- >3) DD AS AS
-
- Wait! If everyone takes in SC, why is CA the best ogger (ogging means
- ogging carriers, right)? How about this chart:
-
- Ogging Bombing Planets
- 1) SC SC SC
- 2) CA AS AS
- 3) DD DD DD
-
- People often fly CA. Going home to refit usually wastes too much time.
- Hence CA is better for taking planets than this chart indicates
- [probably right after SC].
-
-
- Erik
- ---=
-