home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.games.mecha
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!uw-beaver!news.u.washington.edu!stein.u.washington.edu!foregone
- From: foregone@stein.u.washington.edu (Carl Chavez)
- Subject: Re: Mech Design Theory
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.235421.9071@u.washington.edu>
- Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
- References: <1992Dec19.172249.2608@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 23:54:21 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Dec19.172249.2608@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> sjb5@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (STACY JOHN BEHRENS) writes:
-
- >
- >No, I'm talking 20-45 tons and moving 6-9-6+. Much different mech than a
- >Huchback. Used properly, much more effective too.
- >
-
- Well, there's always my Commando variant. Strip out everything and put in
- either a PPC, jump jets and 4 mls, or 5 mls and 2 heat sinks...(3025)
-
- Or a smaller, cheaper Panther: 30 tons, 6 tons armor, large laser, SRM-6
- with 15 shots, goes 6/9/0. (3025)
-
- Or in the city: 35 tons, 6.5 tons armor, AC/20 with 10 shots, 2 mls,
- goes 2/3/2. (3025)
-
-
-
-
-