home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!dsndata!tssi!chessnews
- From: hwr@intercal.com (Hanon W. Russell)
- Subject: Botvinnik Autobiography, Game 35
- Message-ID: <9212302234.0.UUL1.3#20523@intercal.com>
- Sender: chessnews@tssi.com
- Organization: Chessnews list (chessnews-request@tssi.com)
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 02:34:36 GMT
- Lines: 165
-
-
- No. 35 Queen's Gambit
- M. Botvinnik-G. Kasparyan
-
- Semi-Finals, 7th USSR Championship
- Moscow, 1931
-
- 1 d2-d4 d7-d5
- 2 c2-c4 e7-e6
- 3 Nb1-c3 Ng8-f6
- 4 Ng1-f3 Nb8-d7
- 5 Bc1-f4 ...
-
- I played this way successfully against Ragozin in the 1930/31 Leningrad
- Championship. I focused attention on this move after studying Alekhin's
- game against Lasker (New York, 1924). The continuation 5...dc 6 e3 Nd5 7
- Bxc4 Nxf4 8 ef Bd6 9 g3 0-0 10 0-0 Nf6 11 Qe2 (see game No. 62) is not
- considered very good for Black, and therefore my opponent chooses another
- variation, which has, however, a worse reputation.
-
- 5 ... Bf8-b4
- 6 e2-e3 ...
-
- Stronger is 6 cd! ed (6...Nxd5 7 Bd2) 7 e3, so that Black cannot create
- pressure against c3, although theory recommends the move played in the
- game.
-
- 6 ... 0-0
- 7 Qd1-b3 c7-c5
- 8 a2-a3 ...
-
- There could follow 8...Qa5 and 9...Ne4, which would release the tactics in
- the position.
-
- 8 ... Qd8-a5
-
- Black now does not succeed in doubling the White pawns, which would have
- happened after 8...Bxc3+! 9 bc (worse is 9 Qxc3 because of 9...Ne4 and
- 10...Qa5+).
-
- 9 Ra1-c1 Bb4xc3+
- 10 Qb3xc3 ...
-
- After 10 bc b6!, Black would seize the initiative on the Queenside, while
- now an endgame arises in which White's opening advantage in the center
- will manifest itself via his two Bishops. Perhaps my opponent did not
- realize that I would agree to the exchange of Queens. He only needed a
- draw in this game: he was leading the tournament. I had already lost two
- games and needed to win to fight for second place, as otherwise I might
- not qualify for the finals. Only a win would do for this; sober reason
- showed that the best winning chances were in the ending.
-
- 10 ... Qa5xc3+
- 11 b2xc3 b7-b6
- 12 c4xd5 Nf6xd5
-
- If 12...ed, then Black's center pawn restricts the activity of the Queen
- Bishop. Now it occupies the long diagonal and will participate in the
- piece pressure on White's center.
-
- 13 Bf4-g3 ...
-
- An attempt to take advantage of the Bishops' activity by an immediate 13
- Bd6 Rd8 14 Bb5 does not work: 14...Bb7 15 Bxd7 Rxd7 16 dc Rc8.
-
- 13 ... Bc7-b7
- 14 Bf1-b5 Nd5-f6
-
- Black defends carefully in stormy seas. After the natural 14...Rfd8 there
- would follow 15 Bh4 N5f6 16 Ne5!.
-
- 15 Ke1-e2 ...
-
- Another factor determining White's advantage: His King is in the center
- while Black's is still out of play.
-
- 15 ... a7-a6
- 16 Bb5-d3 Rf8-c8
- 17 Rh1-d1 ...
-
- White allows his opponent a double attack, which could have been avoided
- with 17 c4 (17...Ne4 18 Bf4).
-
- 17 ... Nf6-e4
-
- The excellent position of the Bishop is under attack, and 18...cd 19 cd
- Nc3+ is threatened. White chooses the lesser evil.
-
- 18 c3-c4 Bb7-c6
-
- Black is not justified in refraining from the intended exchange. Instead
- of this, which would have given him an approximately equal game, he cedes
- White the basic advantage of the two Bishops.
-
- 19 Bg3-f4 f7-f6
-
- It seems that White now wins a piece: 20 d5 ed 21 cd Bxd5 22 Bxe4, but the
- reply 21...Bb5! maintains the balance.
-
- 20 h2-h4 h7-h6
- 21 Bf4-h2 ...
-
- A preventive move, depriving Black of the potentially useful advance
- g7-g5-g4.
-
- 21 ... Ra8-a7
- 22 Nf3-e1 f6-f5
-
- Otherwise the Knight cannot retreat, but creating weaknesses in the pawn
- structure.
-
- 23 f2-f3 Ne4-f6
- 24 Rd1-d2 b6-b5
-
- Of course, the opening of the position favors the side with the two
- Bishops, and that is White. But on the other hand, Black does not have at
- his disposal any active possibilities, while White has several interesting
- plans. For example, preparing to advance d4-d5, transferring the Knight to
- f4 (after Kf2 and Be2).
-
- 25 d4xc5 b5xc4
-
- Impossible is 25...Nxc5 because of 26 cb and material loss is inevitable.
-
- 26 Bd3xc4 Nd7xc5
- 27 Bh2-d6 Nf6-d7
-
- The only chance of saving the Knight on c5 without giving up the pawn on
- e6.
-
- 28 Rd2-c2 Rc8-e8
-
- A clever defense: The Bishop on c4 has nowhere to go (29 Ba2 Bb5+) while
- on 29 Bxe6+ Nxe6 30 Rxc6 there follows 30...Nd4+.
-
- 29 Ke2-f2! ...
-
- White has two threats: 30 Ba2 and 30 Bxe6+, and they both cannot be
- parried. For example, 29...Ba4 30 Rc3 Kf7 31 Ba2 Nb7 32 Rc7 etc. The game
- continuation ends things quickly.
-
- 29 ... Nc5-b7
- 30 Bc4-a2! Nb7xd6
-
- Or, as has already been noted, 30...Bb5 31 Rc7.
-
- 31 Rc2xc6 Nd6-f7
-
- The pawn on e6 finally falls.
-
- 32 Ba2xe6 Nd7-e5
- 33 Rc6-c8 Ra7-e7
- 34 Rc8xe8+ Re7xe8
- 35 Be6xf5 Resigns
-
- A complicated and double-edged struggle even without Queens.
-
- The results of the Semi-Finals were Kasparyan first and I second, and we
- both proceeded to the finals. Unfortunately, in the finals Kasparyan
- finished last, but I upheld the honor of our preliminary group by winning
- the title of Champion of the USSR for the first time in my life.
-
- Copyright 1988, 1992 Hanon W. Russell
- All Rights Reserved
-
-