home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!<UNAUTHENTICATED>+
- Newsgroups: rec.games.chess
- Message-ID: <EfBgDk70BwxK9DyFpN@transarc.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 02:29:52 -0500
- From: Ron_Kownacki@transarc.com
- Subject: Consensus?
- Lines: 16
-
- I haven't had time to read this group much lately, so I'm just posting to
- see if there has been any net consensus on the following issues:
-
- - Do people feel that Bobby is still the best?
- - Independently of the first question, do the rgc readers still feel
- that he's the champion, as he claims?
- - Do people feel that his playing in Yugoslavia was justified, or not?
- - Is the answer different now that he's faced with a criminal suit?
- - Do people feel that the quality of the match was high, say 2700+?
-
- And by the way, what was the outcome of the solvability issue? I had always
- thought it was solvable, but I guess I could be wrong.
-
- Thanks in advance ... Ron
-
-
-